Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Echinopepon insularis | S.Watson | 24 | documented |
| Echinopepon minimus | (Kellogg) S.Watson | 13 | documented |
| Echinopepon pubescens | Rose | 13 | documented |
| Echinopepon wrightii | (A.Gray) S.Watson | 12 | documented |
| Echinopepon racemosus | (Steud.) C.Jeffrey | 5 | documented |
| Echinopepon arachoideus | (Dieterle) A.K.Monro & Stafford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Echinopepon belizensis | A.K.Monro & Stafford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Echinopepon calcitrapa | McVaugh | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Echinopepon cirrhopedunculatus | Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Echinopepon coulteri | (A.Gray) Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Echinopepon disjunctus | Pozner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Echinopepon glutinosus | (Cogn.) A.K.Monro & Stafford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Echinopepon jaliscanus | Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Echinopepon longispinus | (Cogn.) Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Echinopepon micropaniculatus | A.K.Monro & Stafford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Echinopepon milliflorus | Naudin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Echinopepon paniculatus | (Cogn.) Dieterle | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Echinopepon pringlei | Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Echinopepon rosei | (Cogn.) H.Schaef. & S.S.Renner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Echinopepon torquatus | Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Echinopepon tultitlanapaensis | A.K.Monro & Stafford | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.