Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ebenus pinnata | Aiton | 56 | documented |
| Ebenus cretica | L. | 25 | documented |
| Ebenus stellata | Boiss. | 3 | documented |
| Ebenus laguroides | Boiss. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus argentea | Siehe ex Bornm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus armitagei | Schweinf. & Taub. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus barbigera | Boiss. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus boissieri | Barbey | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus bourgaei | Boiss. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus cappadocica | Hausskn. & Siehe ex Bornm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus depressa | Boiss. & Balansa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus haussknechtii | Bornm. ex Hub.-Mor. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus hirsuta | Jaub. & Spach | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus lagopus | Boiss. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus longipes | Boiss. & Balansa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus macrophylla | Jaub. & Spach | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus pisidica | Hub.-Mor. & Reese | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus plumosa | Boiss. & Balansa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus reesei | Hub.-Mor. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus sibthorpii | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ebenus zekiyeae | Aytaç & Yıldırım | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.