Duosperma

Accepted species 26 Documented here 0 Family Acanthaceae

Accepted species 26 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Duosperma quadrangulare (Klotzsch) Brummitt 3 below the evidence gate
Duosperma actinotrichum (Chiov.) Vollesen 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma clarae Champl. 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma crenatum (Lindau) P.G.Mey. 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma cuprinum Brummitt 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma densiflorum (C.B.Clarke) Brummitt 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma dichotomum Vollesen 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma fanshawei Brummitt 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma fimbriatum Brummitt 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma glabratum Vollesen 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma grandiflorum Vollesen 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma kaessneri (S.Moore) Vollesen & I.Darbysh. 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma kilimandscharicum (Lindau) Dayton 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma latifolium Vollesen 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma livingstoniense Vollesen 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma longicalyx (Deflers) Vollesen 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma nudantherum (C.B.Clarke) Brummitt 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma parviflorum Hedrén & Vollesen 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma porotoense Vollesen 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma rehmannii (Schinz) Vollesen 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma sessilifolium (Lindau) Brummitt 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma stoloniferum Vollesen 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma subquadrangulare Vollesen 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma tanzaniense Vollesen 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma trachyphyllum (Bullock) Dayton 0 below the evidence gate
Duosperma transvaalense (Schinz) Vollesen 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.