Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dunbaria villosa | (Thunb.) Makino | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria bella | Prain | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria circinalis | (Benth.) Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria cumingiana | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria debilis | Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria ferruginea | Wight & Arn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria floresiana | Maesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria fusca | (Wall.) Kurz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria glabra | Thuan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria glandulosa | (Dalzell & A.Gibson) Prain | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria gracilipes | Lace | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria incana | (Zoll. & Moritzi) Maesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria lecomtei | Gagnep. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria longicarpa | (Thuan) Maesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria podocarpa | Kurz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria rotundifolia | (Lour.) Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria rubella | Span. ex Miq. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria spanoghei | Miq. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria trichodon | (Dunn) Maesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dunbaria truncata | (Miq.) Maesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.