Droogmansia

Accepted species 22 Documented here 0 Family Fabaceae

Accepted species 22 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Droogmansia angolensis Torre 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia chevalieri (Harms) Hutch. & Dalziel 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia dorae Torre 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia elongata B.G.Schub. 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia gossweileri Torre 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia grandiflora B.G.Schub. 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia lancifolia Schindl. 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia ledermannii Schindl. 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia longirhachis B.G.Schub. 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia megalantha (Taub.) De Wild. 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia mildbraedii Schindl. 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia montana Jacq.-Fél. 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia munamensis De Wild. 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia pteropus (Baker) De Wild. 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia reducta De Wild. 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia scaettaiana A.Chev. & Sillans 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia sillansiana A.Chev. 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia tenuis B.G.Schub. 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia tisserantii Sillans 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia vanderystii De Wild. 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia vanmeelii B.G.Schub. 0 below the evidence gate
Droogmansia velutina B.G.Schub. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.