Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Driessenia aequiappendiculata | C.Hansen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia attenuata | C.Hansen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia axantha | Korth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia bulbosa | Triana | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia ciliata | Becc. ex Cogn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia dispar | (Cogn.) C.Hansen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia ferox | Bakh.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia glanduligera | Stapf | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia grandithyrsa | C.Hansen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia hepaticoides | C.Hansen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia inaequalifolia | Nayar | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia kemoelensis | Nayar | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia microthrix | Stapf | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia minutiflora | O.Schwartz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia ohwiana | Nayar | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia phasmolacuna | C.W.Lin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia planopetiolata | C.Hansen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia sessiliflora | C.Hansen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia teysmannii | Cogn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Driessenia winkleri | Cogn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.