Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donella viridifolia | (J.M.Wood & Franks) Aubrév. & Pellegr. | 15 | documented |
| Donella lanceolata | (Blume) Aubrév. | 11 | documented |
| Donella ambrensis | Aubrév. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Donella analalavensis | Aubrév. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Donella bangweolensis | (R.E.Fr.) Mackinder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Donella capuronii | (G.E.Schatz & L.Gaut.) Mackinder & L.Gaut. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Donella delphinensis | Aubrév. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Donella fenerivensis | Aubrév. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Donella guereliana | (Aubrév.) Mackinder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Donella humbertii | Capuron ex Mackinder & L.Gaut. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Donella masoalensis | Aubrév. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Donella ogoouensis | (A.Chev.) Aubrév. & Pellegr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Donella perrieri | Lecomte | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Donella pruniformis | (Engl.) Pierre ex Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Donella ranirisonii | L.Gaut. & Mackinder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Donella ubangiensis | (De Wild.) Aubrév. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Donella welwitschii | (Engl.) Pierre ex Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.