Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dipsacus fullonum | L. | 4,697 | documented |
| Dipsacus laciniatus | L. | 953 | documented |
| Dipsacus sativus | (L.) Honck. | 508 | documented |
| Dipsacus pilosus | L. | 202 | documented |
| Dipsacus strigosus | Willd. | 118 | documented |
| Dipsacus comosus | Hoffmanns. & Link | 24 | documented |
| Dipsacus inermis | Wall. | 20 | documented |
| Dipsacus ferox | Loisel. | 6 | documented |
| Dipsacus chinensis | Batalin | 3 | documented |
| Dipsacus gmelinii | M.Bieb. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Dipsacus pinnatifidus | Steud. ex A.Rich. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Dipsacus asperoides | C.Y.Cheng & T.M.Ai | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dipsacus atratus | Hook.f. & Thomson ex C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dipsacus cephalarioides | V.A.Matthews & Kupicha | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dipsacus dipsacoides | (Kar. & Kir.) V.I.Botsch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dipsacus japonicus | Miq. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dipsacus leschenaultii | Coult. ex DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dipsacus lijiangensis | Ai & H.B.Chen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dipsacus narcisseanus | Lawalrée | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dipsacus pseudosylvestris | Schur | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dipsacus valsecchii | Camarda | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dipsacus walkeri | Arn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dipsacus xinjiangensis | Y.K.Yang, J.K.Wu & Abdulla | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.