Diplospora

Accepted species 23 Documented here 1 Family Rubiaceae

Accepted species 23 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Diplospora dubia (Lindl.) Masam. 60 documented
Diplospora bilocularis (Kurz) M.Gangop. & Chakrab. 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora cuspidata Valeton 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora erythrospora (Thwaites) Bedd. 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora fasciculiflora (Elmer) Elmer 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora fruticosa Hemsl. 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora griffithii Hook.f. 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora kunstleri King & Gamble 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora lasiantha Ridl. 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora majumdarii M.Gangop. & Chakrab. 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora minahassae Koord. 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora mollissima Hutch. 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora negrosensis (Elmer) Arriola & Alejandro 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora puberula (Merr.) S.J.Ali & Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora pubescens Hook.f. 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora schmidtii (K.Schum.) Craib 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora sessilis Elmer 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora siamica Craib 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora sorsogonensis (Elmer) A.P.Davis 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora stylosa Ridl. 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora tinagoensis (Elmer) S.J.Ali & Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora velutina King & Gamble 0 below the evidence gate
Diplospora wrayi King & Gamble 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.