Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diplophyllum albicans | (L.) Dumort. | 218 | documented |
| Diplophyllum apiculatum | (A.Evans) Steph. | 37 | documented |
| Diplophyllum obtusifolium | (Hook.) Dumort. | 29 | documented |
| Diplophyllum taxifolium | (Wahlenb.) Dumort. | 14 | documented |
| Diplophyllum africanum | S.W.Arnell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum andicola | R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum andrewsii | A.Evans | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum androgynum | J.J.Engel & G.L.Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum angustifolium | J.J.Engel & G.L.Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum dioicum | R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum exiguum | Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum gemmiparum | J.J.Engel & G.L.Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum incrassatum | J.J.Engel & G.L.Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum kinabaluense | Furuki & Suleiman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum nanum | Herzog | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum novum | J.J.Engel & G.L.Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum obtusatum | (R.M.Schust.) R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum purpurascens | Bakalin & Vilnet | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum recurvifolium | C.Massal. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum serrulatum | (Müll.Frib.) Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum sibiricum | Vilnet & Bakalin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum squarrosum | Steph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum trollii | Grolle | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diplophyllum verrucosum | R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.