Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diphysa americana | (Mill.) M.Sousa | 34 | documented |
| Diphysa suberosa | S.Watson | 11 | documented |
| Diphysa occidentalis | Rose | 5 | documented |
| Diphysa floribunda | Peyr. | 4 | documented |
| Diphysa puberulenta | Rydb. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa carthagenensis | Jacq. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa echinata | Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa humilis | Oerst. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa macrocarpa | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa macrophylla | Lundell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa microphylla | Rydb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa minutifolia | Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa ormocarpoides | (Rudd) M.Sousa & R.Antonio | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa paucifoliolata | R.Antonio & M.Sousa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa punctata | Rydb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa racemosa | Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa sennoides | Benth. & Oerst. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa spinosa | Rydb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa thurberi | (A.Gray) Rydb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa vesicaria | M.E.Jones | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa villosa | Rydb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Diphysa yucatanensis | Hanan-Alipi & M.Sousa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.