Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Didelotia africana | Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Didelotia afzelii | Taub. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Didelotia brevipaniculata | J.Léonard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Didelotia engleri | Dinkl. & Harms | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Didelotia gracillima | Jongkind | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Didelotia idae | J.Léonard, Oldeman & de Wit | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Didelotia korupensis | Burgt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Didelotia ledermannii | Harms | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Didelotia letouzeyi | Pellegr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Didelotia minutiflora | (A.Chev.) J.Léonard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Didelotia morelii | Aubrév. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Didelotia pauli-sitai | Letouzey | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Didelotia unifoliolata | J.Léonard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.