Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dicymbe fraterna | R.S.Cowan | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe altsonii | Sandwith | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe amazonica | Ducke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe arenicola | W.A.Rodrigues | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe bernardii | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe corymbosa | Spruce ex Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe duidae | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe froesii | Ducke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe heteroxylon | Ducke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe hymenaea | Barneby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe jenmanii | Sandwith | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe mollis | Barneby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe neblinensis | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe paruensis | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe pharangophila | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe praeruptorum | Barneby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe puncticulosa | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe stipitata | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe uaiparuensis | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dicymbe yutajensis | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.