Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dictyanthus yucatanensis | Standl. | 20 | documented |
| Dictyanthus sepicola | (W.D.Stevens) W.D.Stevens | 17 | documented |
| Dictyanthus pavonii | Decne. | 16 | documented |
| Dictyanthus reticulatus | (Turcz.) Benth. & Hook.f. ex Hemsl. | 12 | documented |
| Dictyanthus ceratopetalus | Donn.Sm. | 3 | documented |
| Dictyanthus aeneus | Woodson | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Dictyanthus asper | (Mill.) W.D.Stevens | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Dictyanthus altatensis | (Brandegee) W.D.Stevens | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Dictyanthus tigrinus | Conz. & Standl. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Dictyanthus eximius | (W.D.Stevens) W.D.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dictyanthus hamatus | (W.D.Stevens) W.D.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dictyanthus lautus | (W.D.Stevens) W.D.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dictyanthus macvaughianus | (W.D.Stevens) W.D.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dictyanthus nichongus | L.O.Alvarado, R.Sánchez Cris. & A.López Hern. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dictyanthus parviflorus | Hemsl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dictyanthus reflexiflorus | Lozada-Pérez, E.B.Cortez & Martínez-Ambr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dictyanthus stevensii | Gonz.-Martínez, Lozada-Pérez & L.O.Alvarado | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dictyanthus suffruticosus | (W.D.Stevens) W.D.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dictyanthus tuberosus | C.B.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.