Dicranopygium

Accepted species 54 Documented here 0 Family Cyclanthaceae

Accepted species 54 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Dicranopygium amazonicum Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium angustissimum (Sandwith) Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium aristeguietae Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium arusisense Tuberq. 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium atrovirens (H.Wendl.) Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium aurantiacum (R.E.Schult.) Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium bolivarense Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium calimense Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium callithrix Silverst. 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium campii Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium coma-pyrrhae (Harling) Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium crinitum Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium cuatrecasasianum Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium dolichostemon Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium euryphyllum (Harling) Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium fissile Galeano & R.Bernal 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium globosum Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium goudotii Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium gracile (Liebm. ex Matuda) Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium grandifolium Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium harlingii G.J.Wilder 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium idrobonis Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium imeriense Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium insulare (Gleason) Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium latissimum Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium lugonis Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium macrophyllum Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium microcephalum (Hook.f.) Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium mirabile Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium nanum (Gleason) Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium novogranatense Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium odoratum Tuberq. 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium omichlophilum R.E.Schult. ex Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium pachystemon Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium parvulum (Harling) Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium polycephalum Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium pygmaeum (Gleason) Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium rheithrophilum (Harling) Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium robustum Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium rupestre (Klotzsch) Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium sanctae-martae Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium sararense Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium schultesii Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium scoparum Galeano & R.Bernal 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium stenophyllum Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium tatica Hammel 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium testaceum Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium trianae Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium umbrophilum Hammel 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium venezuelanum Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium wallisii (Regel) Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium wedelii Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium williamsii (Standl.) Harling 0 below the evidence gate
Dicranopygium yacu-sisa Harling 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.