Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dichocarpum adiantifolium | (Hook.f. & Thomson) W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 18 | documented |
| Dichocarpum arisanense | (Hayata) W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum auriculatum | (Franch.) W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum basilare | W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum carinatum | D.Z.Fu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum dalzielii | (J.R.Drumm. & Hutch.) W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum dicarpon | (Miq.) W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum fargesii | (Franch.) W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum franchetii | (Finet & Gagnep.) W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum hakonense | (Maekawa & Tuyama ex Ohwi) W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum hypoglaucum | W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum nipponicum | (Franch.) W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum numajirianum | (Makino) W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum stoloniferum | (Maxim.) W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum sutchuenense | (Franch.) W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum trachyspermum | (Maxim.) W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum trifoliolatum | W.T.Wang & Hsiao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichocarpum wuchuanense | S.Z.He | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.