Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dichanthium annulatum | (Forssk.) Stapf | 376 | documented |
| Dichanthium aristatum | (Poir.) C.E.Hubb. | 156 | documented |
| Dichanthium sericeum | (R.Br.) A.Camus | 138 | documented |
| Dichanthium armatum | (Hook.f.) Blatt. & McCann | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium caricosum | (L.) A.Camus | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium concanense | (Hook.f.) S.K.Jain & Deshp. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium concanensis | (Hook.f.) S.K.Jain & Deshp. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium erectum | Ohwi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium fecundum | S.T.Blake | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium foulkesii | (Hook.f.) S.K.Jain & Deshp. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium foveolatum | (Delile) Roberty | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium mccannii | Blatt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium micranthum | Cope | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium mucronulatum | Jansen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium panchganiense | Blatt. & McCann | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium paranjpyeanum | (Bhide) Clayton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium queenslandicum | B.K.Simon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium setosum | S.T.Blake | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium tenue | (R.Br.) A.Camus | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dichanthium tuberculatum | (Hack.) Cope | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.