Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Denhamia celastroides | (F.Muell.) Jessup | 90 | documented |
| Denhamia disperma | (F.Muell.) M.P.Simmons | 71 | documented |
| Denhamia pittosporoides | F.Muell. | 68 | documented |
| Denhamia silvestris | (Lander & L.A.S.Johnson) M.P.Simmons | 61 | documented |
| Denhamia bilocularis | (F.Muell.) M.P.Simmons | 58 | documented |
| Denhamia cunninghamii | (Hook.) M.P.Simmons | 44 | documented |
| Denhamia oleaster | (Lindl.) F.Muell. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Denhamia cupularis | (Ding Hou) M.P.Simmons | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Denhamia fasciculiflora | (Jessup) M.P.Simmons | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Denhamia fournieri | (Pancher & Sebert) M.P.Simmons | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Denhamia megacarpa | J.J.Halford & Jessup | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Denhamia moorei | Jessup | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Denhamia muelleri | (Benth.) Jessup | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Denhamia obscura | (A.Rich.) Meisn. ex Walp. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Denhamia parvifolia | L.S.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Denhamia peninsularis | J.J.Halford & Jessup | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Denhamia viridissima | F.M.Bailey & F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.