Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dendrolobium triangulare | (Retz.) Schindl. | 44 | documented |
| Dendrolobium dispermum | (Hayata) Schindl. | 17 | documented |
| Dendrolobium umbellatum | (L.) Benth. | 11 | documented |
| Dendrolobium arbuscula | (Domin) H.Ohashi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dendrolobium baccatum | (Schindl.) Schindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dendrolobium cheelii | (C.A.Gardner) Pedley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dendrolobium cumingianum | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dendrolobium geesinkii | H.Ohashi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dendrolobium lanceolatum | (Dunn) Schindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dendrolobium olivaceum | (Prain) Schindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dendrolobium papuacola | H.Ohashi & T.Nemoto | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dendrolobium polyneurum | (S.T.Blake) H.Ohashi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dendrolobium quinquepetalum | (Blanco) Schindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dendrolobium rostratum | (Schindl.) Schindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dendrolobium rugosum | (Prain) Schindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dendrolobium stipatum | S.T.Blake | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dendrolobium thorelii | (Gagnep.) Schindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dendrolobium ursinum | (Schindl.) Schindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.