Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dacrydium cupressinum | Sol. ex G.Forst. | 1,175 | documented |
| Dacrydium araucarioides | Brongn. & Gris | 4 | documented |
| Dacrydium beccarii | Parl. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium × suprinii | Nimsch | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium balansae | Brongn. & Gris | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium comosum | Corner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium cornwallianum | (de Laub.) de Laub. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium elatum | (Roxb.) Wall. ex Hook. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium ericoides | de Laub. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium gibbsiae | Stapf | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium gracile | de Laub. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium guillauminii | J.Buchholz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium leptophyllum | (Wasscher) de Laub. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium lycopodioides | Brongn. & Gris | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium magnum | de Laub. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium medium | de Laub. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium nausoriense | de Laub. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium nidulum | de Laub. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium novoguineense | Gibbs | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium pectinatum | de Laub. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium spathoides | de Laub. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium tenuifolium | Parl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium vieillardii | Parl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Dacrydium xanthandrum | Pilg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.