Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cystostemon barbatus | (Vaupel) A.G.Mill. & Riedl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon ethiopicus | A.G.Mill. & Riedl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon heliocharis | (S.Moore) A.G.Mill. & Riedl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon hispidissimus | (S.Moore) A.G.Mill. & Riedl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon hispidus | (Baker & C.H.Wright) A.G.Mill. & Riedl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon intricatus | A.G.Mill. & Riedl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon kissenioides | (Deflers) A.G.Mill. & Riedl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon linearifolius | E.S.Martins | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon loveridgei | E.S.Martins | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon macrantherus | (Gürke) A.G.Mill. & Riedl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon mechowii | (Vaupel) A.G.Mill. & Riedl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon medusa | (Baker) A.G.Mill. & Riedl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon mwinilungensis | E.S.Martins | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon socotranum | Balf.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon socotranus | Balf.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon somaliensis | A.G.Mill. & Riedl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystostemon virescens | A.G.Mill. & Riedl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.