Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cystorchis aberrans | J.J.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis aphylla | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis appendiculata | J.J.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis celebica | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis dentifera | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis gracilis | (Hook.f.) Holttum | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis javanica | (Blume) Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis luzonensis | Ames | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis macrophysa | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis marginata | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis ogurae | (Tuyama) Ormerod & P.J.Cribb | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis orphnophilla | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis peliocaulos | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis ranaiensis | J.J.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis saccosepala | J.J.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis salmoneus | J.J.Wood | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis saprophytica | J.J.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis stenoglossa | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis variegata | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cystorchis versteegii | J.J.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.