Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cylindrocolea abyssinica | (Gola) Váňa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea andersonii | R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea brasiliensis | D.P.Costa, N.D.Santos & Váňa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea chevalieri | (Steph.) R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea devendrae | Manju & P.P.Nishida | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea gittinsii | (E.W.Jones) R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea kiaeri | (Austin) Váňa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea madagascariensis | (Steph.) R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea mizoramensis | Sushil K.Singh | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea nigerica | (E.W.Jones) R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea novae-caledoniae | (Grolle) R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea planifolia | (Steph.) R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea recurvifolia | (Steph.) Inoue | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea reticulata | Udar & Ad.Kumar | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea rhizantha | (Mont.) R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea sanctae-helenae | M.Wigginton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea sprucei | R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea tagawae | (N.Kitag.) R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cylindrocolea ugandica | (E.W.Jones) R.M.Schust. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.