Cyananthus

Accepted species 21 Documented here 2 Family Campanulaceae

Accepted species 21 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Cyananthus lobatus Wall. ex Benth. 18 documented
Cyananthus microphyllus Edgew. 3 documented
Cyananthus flavus C.Marquand 2 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus lichiangensis W.W.Sm. 2 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus hookeri C.B.Clarke 1 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus cordifolius Duthie 0 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus delavayi Franch. 0 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus fasciculatus C.Marquand 0 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus formosus Diels 0 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus hayanus hort. 0 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus himalaicus K.K.Shrestha 0 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus incanus Hook.f. & Thomson 0 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus inflatus Hook.f. & Thomson 0 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus integer Wall. ex Benth. 0 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus ligulosus D.Y.Hong 0 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus longiflorus Franch. 0 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus macrocalyx Franch. 0 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus pedunculatus C.B.Clarke 0 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus sericeus Y.S.Lian 0 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus sherriffii Cowan 0 below the evidence gate
Cyananthus wardii C.Marquand 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.