Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cuatresia harlingiana | Hunz. | 7 | documented |
| Cuatresia riparia | (Kunth) Hunz. | 7 | documented |
| Cuatresia fosteriana | Hunz. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia albertovelozii | Zanoni & Jiménez Rodr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia amistadensis | D.A.Soto & A.K.Monro | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia anomala | N.W.Sawyer & C.I.Orozco | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia colombiana | Hunz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia cuneata | (Standl.) Bohs | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia cuspidata | (Dunal) Hunz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia exiguiflora | (D'Arcy) Hunz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia foreroi | Hunz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia garciae | Hunz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia glomeruflorula | Canal & C.I.Orozco | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia hunzikeriana | (Benítez & M.Martínez) N.W.Sawyer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia morii | (D'Arcy) Sousa-Peña ex Bohs | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia physalana | C.I.Orozco & W.G.Vargas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia plowmanii | Hunz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia puberula | C.I.Orozco & W.G.Vargas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cuatresia trianae | Hunz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.