Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cristaria integerrima | Phil. | 18 | documented |
| Cristaria glaucophylla | Cav. | 11 | documented |
| Cristaria andicola | Gay | 3 | documented |
| Cristaria dissecta | Hook. & Arn. | 3 | documented |
| Cristaria adenophora | I.M.Johnst. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria argyliifolia | Phil. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria aspera | Gay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria calderana | Muñoz-Schick | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria cordatorotundifolia | Gay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria cyanea | Phil. ex Baker f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria fuentesiana | I.M.Johnst. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria gracilis | Gay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria hispida | Poepp. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria insularis | Phil. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria leucantha | I.M.Johnst. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria microptera | Phil. ex Baker f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria moliniae | Gay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria multifida | (Dombey ex Cav.) Cav. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria multiflora | Gay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria ovata | Muñoz-Schick | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria tenuissima | Muñoz-Schick | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cristaria viridiluteola | Gay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.