Craspedia

Accepted species 25 Documented here 10 Family Asteraceae

Accepted species 25 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Craspedia uniflora G.Forst. 94 documented
Craspedia variabilis J.Everett & Doust 94 documented
Craspedia minor (Hook.f.) Allan 14 documented
Craspedia lanata (Hook.f.) Allan 11 documented
Craspedia maxgrayi J.Everett & Joy Thomps. 8 documented
Craspedia lamicola J.Everett & Joy Thomps. 7 documented
Craspedia incana Cockayne & Allan 5 documented
Craspedia glauca Spreng. 4 documented
Craspedia canens J.Everett & Doust 3 documented
Craspedia paludicola J.Everett & Doust 3 documented
Craspedia alba J.Everett & Joy Thomps. 5 below the evidence gate
Craspedia adenophora K.L.McDougall & N.G.Walsh 3 below the evidence gate
Craspedia aurantia J.Everett & Joy Thomps. 2 below the evidence gate
Craspedia gracilis Hook. 2 below the evidence gate
Craspedia macrocephala Hook. 2 below the evidence gate
Craspedia glabrata (Hook.f.) Rozefelds 1 below the evidence gate
Craspedia costiniana J.Everett & Joy Thomps. 0 below the evidence gate
Craspedia crocata J.Everett & Joy Thomps. 0 below the evidence gate
Craspedia jamesii J.Everett & Joy Thomps. 0 below the evidence gate
Craspedia leucantha F.Muell. 0 below the evidence gate
Craspedia major (Hook.f.) Allan 0 below the evidence gate
Craspedia pilosa Spreng. 0 below the evidence gate
Craspedia preminghana Rozefelds 0 below the evidence gate
Craspedia richea Cass. 0 below the evidence gate
Craspedia robusta (Hook.f.) Cockayne 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.