Corylopsis

Accepted species 25 Documented here 1 Family Hamamelidaceae

Accepted species 25 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Corylopsis pauciflora Siebold & Zucc. 12 documented
Corylopsis alnifolia (H.Lév.) C.K.Schneid. 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis brevistyla H.T.Chang 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis calcicola C.Y.Wu 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis coreana Uyeki 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis glabrescens Franch. & Sav. 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis glandulifera Hemsl. 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis glaucescens Hand.-Mazz. 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis gotoana Makino 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis henryi Hemsl. 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis himalayana Griff. 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis microcarpa H.T.Chang 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis multiflora Hance 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis obovata H.T.Chang 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis omeiensis W.C.Cheng 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis platypetala Rehder & E.H.Wilson 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis rotundifolia H.T.Chang 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis sinensis Hemsl. 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis spicata Siebold & Zucc. 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis trabeculosa Hu & W.C.Cheng 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis veitchiana Bean 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis velutina Hand.-Mazz. 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis willmottiae Rehder & E.H.Wilson 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis yui Hu & W.C.Cheng 0 below the evidence gate
Corylopsis yunnanensis Diels 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.