Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conioselinum tataricum | Hoffm. | 93 | documented |
| Conioselinum chinense | (L.) Britton, Sterns & Poggenb. | 65 | documented |
| Conioselinum scopulorum | (A.Gray) J.M.Coult. & Rose | 10 | documented |
| Conioselinum morrisonense | Hayata | 9 | documented |
| Conioselinum longifolium | Turcz. | 4 | documented |
| Conioselinum acuminatum | (Franch.) Lavrova | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Conioselinum anthriscoides | (H.Boissieu) Pimenov & Kljuykov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Conioselinum mexicanum | J.M.Coult. & Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Conioselinum nepalense | Pimenov & Kljuykov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Conioselinum officinale | (Makino) K.Ohashi & H.Ohashi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Conioselinum pseudoangelica | (H.Boissieu) Pimenov & Kljuykov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Conioselinum pteridophyllum | (Franch.) Lavrova | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Conioselinum reflexum | Pimenov & Kljuykov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Conioselinum shanii | Pimenov & Kljuykov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Conioselinum sinchianum | (K.T.Fu) Pimenov & Kljuykov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Conioselinum smithii | (H.Wolff) Pimenov & Kljuykov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Conioselinum tenuisectum | (H.Boissieu) Pimenov & Kljuykov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Conioselinum tenuissimum | (Nakai) Pimenov & Kljuykov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.