Coniogramme

Accepted species 24 Documented here 3 Family Pteridaceae

Accepted species 24 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Coniogramme japonica (Thunb.) Diels 50 documented
Coniogramme intermedia Hieron. 49 documented
Coniogramme pilosa Hieron. 4 documented
Coniogramme affinis Hieron. 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme africana Hieron. 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme bashanensis X.S.Guo & Bin Li 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme denticulato-serrata (Hieron.) R.D.Dixit & A.Das 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme emeiensis Ching & K.H.Shing 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme falcipinna Ching & K.H.Shing 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme fauriei Hieron. 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme fraxinea (D.Don) Diels 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme gracilis M.Ogata 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme jinggangshanensis Ching & K.H.Shing 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme ovata S.K.Wu 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme procera Fée 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme pubescens Hieron. 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme robusta Christ 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme rosthorni Hieron. 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme rubicaulis Ching 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme serrulata (Blume) Fée 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme suprapilosa Ching 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme taipeiensis Ching 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme venusta Ching 0 below the evidence gate
Coniogramme wilsonii Hieron. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.