Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compsoneura excelsa | A.C.Sm. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura anoriensis | Janovec & A.K.Neill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura atopa | (A.C.Sm.) A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura capitellata | (Poepp. ex A.DC.) Warb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura claroensis | Janovec & A.K.Neill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura cuatrecasasii | A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura debilis | (Spruce ex A.DC.) Warb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura diazii | Janovec | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura lapidiflora | T.S.Jaram. & Balslev | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura mexicana | (Hemsl.) Janovec | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura mutisii | A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura racemosa | Ducke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura rigidifolia | W.A.Rodrigues | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura schultesiana | W.A.Rodrigues | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura sprucei | (A.DC.) Warb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura trianae | Warb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Compsoneura ulei | Warb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.