Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comastoma tenellum | (Rottb.) Toyok. | 33 | documented |
| Comastoma alashanicum | Y.Z.Zhao & Z.Y.Chu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma cyananthiflorum | (Franch.) Holub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma dechyanum | (Sommier & Levier) Holub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma disepalum | H.W.Li ex T.N.Ho | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma falcatum | (Turcz.) Toyok. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma henryi | (Hemsl.) Holub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma irinae | (Pachom.) Czerep. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma jigzhiense | T.N.Ho & J.Q.Liu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma malyschevii | (Zuev) Zuev | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma muliense | (C.Marquand) T.N.Ho | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma nanum | (Wulfen) Toyok. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma pedunculatum | (Royle ex G.Don) Holub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma polycladum | (Diels & Gilg) T.N.Ho | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma pseudopulmonarium | Omer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma pulmonarium | (Turcz.) Toyok. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma stellariifolium | (Franch.) Holub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma traillianum | (Forrest) Holub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Comastoma urnigera | (E.Aitken & D.G.Long) Holub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.