Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cochlidium serrulatum | (Sw.) L.E.Bishop | 23 | documented |
| Cochlidium furcatum | (Hook. & Grev.) C.Chr. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Cochlidium acrosorum | A.Rojas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cochlidium attenuatum | A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cochlidium connellii | (Baker ex C.H.Wright) A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cochlidium graminoides | (Sw.) Kaulf. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cochlidium jungens | L.E.Bishop | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cochlidium linearifolium | (Desv.) Maxon ex C.Chr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cochlidium nervatum | A.Rojas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cochlidium proctorii | (Copel.) L.E.Bishop | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cochlidium pumilum | C.Chr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cochlidium punctatum | (Raddi) L.E.Bishop | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cochlidium repandum | L.E.Bishop | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cochlidium rostratum | (Hook.) Maxon ex C.Chr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cochlidium seminudum | Maxon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cochlidium tepuiense | (A.C.Sm.) L.E.Bishop | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cochlidium wurdackii | L.E.Bishop | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.