Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clausena excavata | Burm.f. | 52 | documented |
| Clausena anisata | (Willd.) Hook.f. | 38 | documented |
| Clausena lansium | (Lour.) Skeels | 6 | documented |
| Clausena agasthyamalayana | E.S.S.Kumar, Shareef, P.E.Roy & Veldkamp | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena anisum-olens | (Blanco) Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena austroindica | B.C.Stone & K.Narayanan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena brevistyla | Oliv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena emarginata | C.C.Huang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena engleri | Tanaka | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena hainanensis | C.C.Huang & F.W.Xing | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena harmandiana | Pierre ex Guillaumin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena henryi | (Swingle) C.C.Huang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena heptaphylla | (Roxb. ex DC.) Wight & Arn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena indica | (Dalzell) Oliv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena inolida | Z.J.Yu & C.Y.Wong | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena lenis | Drake | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena luxurians | (Kurz) Swingle | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena pentaphylla | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena poilanei | Molino | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena wallichii | Oliv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Clausena yunnanensis | C.C.Huang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.