Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citronella mucronata | (Ruiz & Pav.) D.Don | 78 | documented |
| Citronella moorei | (F.Muell. ex Benth.) R.A.Howard | 19 | documented |
| Citronella gongonha | (Mart.) R.A.Howard | 5 | documented |
| Citronella apogon | (Griseb.) R.A.Howard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella costaricensis | (Donn.Sm.) R.A.Howard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella engleriana | (Loes.) R.A.Howard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella hirsuta | Munzinger | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella incarum | (J.F.Macbr.) R.A.Howard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella latifolia | (Merr.) R.A.Howard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella lucidula | (Sleumer) R.A.Howard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella macrocarpa | Hürl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella melliodora | (Sleumer) R.A.Howard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella paniculata | (Mart.) R.A.Howard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella philippinensis | (Merr.) R.A.Howard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella samoensis | (A.Gray) R.A.Howard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella sarmentosa | (Baill.) R.A.Howard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella silvatica | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella smythii | (F.Muell.) R.A.Howard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella suaveolens | (Blume) R.A.Howard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Citronella vitiensis | R.A.Howard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.