Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysocoma ciliata | L. | 530 | documented |
| Chrysocoma coma-aurea | L. | 243 | documented |
| Chrysocoma esterhuyseniae | Ehr.Bayer | 14 | documented |
| Chrysocoma hantamensis | J.C.Manning & Goldblatt | 11 | documented |
| Chrysocoma valida | Ehr.Bayer | 8 | documented |
| Chrysocoma tridentata | DC. | 6 | documented |
| Chrysocoma obtusata | (Thunb.) Ehr.Bayer | 4 | documented |
| Chrysocoma strigosa | Ehr.Bayer | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma rigidula | (DC.) Ehr.Bayer | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma acicularis | Ehr.Bayer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma candelabrum | Ehr.Bayer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma cernua | L. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma flava | Ehr.Bayer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma horizontalis | Vell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma longifolia | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma microphylla | Thunb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma mozambicensis | Ehr.Bayer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma oblongifolia | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma ovata | Forssk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma paniculata | Vell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma pedunculata | Vell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma puberula | Schltr. ex Merxm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma schlechteri | Ehr.Bayer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma sparsifolia | Hutch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chrysocoma tomentosa | L. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.