Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheniella glauca | (Benth.) R.Clark & Mackinder | 11 | documented |
| Cheniella corymbosa | (Roxb. ex DC.) R.Clark & Mackinder | 5 | documented |
| Cheniella clemensiorum | (Merr.) R.Clark & Mackinder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cheniella damiaoshanensis | (T.C.Chen) R.Clark & Mackinder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cheniella didyma | (H.Y.Chen) R.Clark & Mackinder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cheniella hechiensis | S.R.Gu, T.Y.Tu & D.X.Zhang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cheniella lakhonensis | (Gagnep.) R.Clark & Mackinder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cheniella longipes | (Hosok.) S.R.Gu, T.Y.Tu & D.X.Zhang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cheniella longistaminea | S.R.Gu, T.Y.Tu & D.X.Zhang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cheniella ovatifolia | (T.C.Chen) R.Clark & Mackinder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cheniella pubicarpa | S.R.Gu, T.Y.Tu & D.X.Zhang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cheniella tenuiflora | (Watt ex C.B.Clarke) R.Clark & Mackinder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cheniella tianlinensis | (T.C.Chen & D.X.Zhang) S.R.Gu, T.Y.Tu & D.X.Zhang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cheniella touranensis | (Gagnep.) R.Clark & Mackinder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cheniella tsoongii | X.Peng, K.W.Jiang & T.Y.Tu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.