Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chelonopsis deflexa | (Benth.) Diels | 8 | documented |
| Chelonopsis moschata | Miq. | 3 | documented |
| Chelonopsis abbreviata | C.Y.Wu & H.W.Li | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis bracteata | W.W.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis cashmerica | (Mukerjee) Hedge | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis chekiangensis | C.Y.Wu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis forrestii | Anthony | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis giraldii | Diels | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis lichiangensis | W.W.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis longipes | Makino | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis mollissima | C.Y.Wu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis odontochila | Diels | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis praecox | Weckerle & F.K.Huber | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis rosea | W.W.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis siccanea | W.W.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis souliei | (Bonati) Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis thailandica | A.J.Paton, Suddee & Bongch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis yagiharana | Hisauti & Matsuno | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chelonopsis yaoshanensis | (S.L.Mo & F.N.Wei) C.L.Xiang & H.Peng | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.