Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chamelaucium uncinatum | Schauer | 8 | documented |
| Chamelaucium forrestii | (F.Muell.) N.G.Marchant | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium megalopetalum | F.Muell. ex Benth. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium axillare | F.Muell. ex Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium brevifolium | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium ciliatum | Desf. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium confertiflorum | Domin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium drummondii | (Turcz.) Meisn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium erythrochlorum | N.G.Marchant | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium floriferum | N.G.Marchant | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium gracile | F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium heterandrum | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium lullfitzii | N.G.Marchant | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium marchantii | Strid | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium micranthum | (Turcz.) Domin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium orarium | N.G.Marchant | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium pauciflorum | (Turcz.) Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium repens | (A.S.George) N.G.Marchant | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium roycei | N.G.Marchant | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium virgatum | Endl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Chamelaucium xanthocladum | N.G.Marchant | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.