Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cenostigma eriostachys | (Benth.) Gagnon & G.P.Lewis | 37 | documented |
| Cenostigma gaumeri | (Greenm.) Gagnon & G.P.Lewis | 18 | documented |
| Cenostigma pluviosum | (DC.) Gagnon & G.P.Lewis | 3 | documented |
| Cenostigma macrophyllum | Tul. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Cenostigma nordestinum | Gagnon & G.P.Lewis | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Cenostigma tocantinum | Ducke | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Cenostigma bracteosum | (Tul.) Gagnon & G.P.Lewis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cenostigma diversifolium | (Benth.) Gaem | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cenostigma laxiflorum | (Tul.) Gagnon & G.P.Lewis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cenostigma marginatum | (Tul.) Gagnon & G.P.Lewis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cenostigma microphyllum | (Mart. ex G.Don) Gagnon & G.P.Lewis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cenostigma myabense | (Britton) Gagnon & G.P.Lewis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cenostigma pellucidum | (Vogel) Gagnon & G.P.Lewis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cenostigma pinnatum | (Griseb.) Gagnon & G.P.Lewis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cenostigma pyramidale | (Tul.) Gagnon & G.P.Lewis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.