Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cedrela odorata | L. | 117 | documented |
| Cedrela montana | Moritz ex Turcz. | 45 | documented |
| Cedrela dugesii | S.Watson | 38 | documented |
| Cedrela salvadorensis | Standl. | 28 | documented |
| Cedrela fissilis | Vell. | 14 | documented |
| Cedrela tonduzii | C.DC. | 8 | documented |
| Cedrela angustifolia | Moc. & Sessé ex DC. | 4 | documented |
| Cedrela oaxacensis | C.DC. & Rose | 3 | documented |
| Cedrela angusticarpa | W.Palacios | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cedrela balansae | C.DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cedrela discolor | S.F.Blake | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cedrela domatifolia | W.Palacios | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cedrela gonzalopalominoi | Villanueva & M.E.Morales | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cedrela kuelapensis | T.D.Penn. & Daza | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cedrela longipetiolulata | Harms | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cedrela molinensis | T.D.Penn. & Reynel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cedrela monroensis | T.D.Penn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cedrela nebulosa | T.D.Penn. & Daza | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cedrela ngobe | Köcke, T.D.Penn. & Muellner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cedrela saltensis | M.A.Zapater & del Castillo | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Cedrela weberbaueri | Harms | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.