Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catopsis occulta | Mart.-Correa, Espejo & López-Ferr. | 19 | documented |
| Catopsis berteroniana | (Schult. & Schult.f.) Mez | 17 | documented |
| Catopsis nutans | (Sw.) Griseb. | 17 | documented |
| Catopsis sessiliflora | (Ruiz & Pav.) Mez | 17 | documented |
| Catopsis paniculata | É.Morren | 14 | documented |
| Catopsis floribunda | L.B.Sm. | 8 | documented |
| Catopsis oerstediana | Mez | 7 | documented |
| Catopsis nitida | (Hook.) Griseb. | 3 | documented |
| Catopsis morreniana | Mez | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Catopsis compacta | Mez | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Catopsis subulata | L.B.Sm. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Catopsis wawranea | Mez | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Catopsis berteroana | (Schult. & Schult.f.) Mez | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Catopsis delicatula | L.B.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Catopsis juncifolia | Mez & Wercklé | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Catopsis micrantha | L.B.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Catopsis minimiflora | Matuda | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Catopsis montana | L.B.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Catopsis pedicellata | L.B.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Catopsis pisiformis | Rauh | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Catopsis wangerinii | Mez & Wercklé | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Catopsis wawreana | Mez | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Catopsis werckleana | Mez | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.