Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Castelnavia cuneifolia | P.Royen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Castelnavia fimbriata | Tul. & Wedd. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Castelnavia fluitans | Tul. & Wedd. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Castelnavia lindmaniana | Warm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Castelnavia monandra | Tul. & Wedd. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Castelnavia multipartita | Tul. & Wedd. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Castelnavia noveloi | C.T.Philbrick & C.P.Bove | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Castelnavia orthocarpa | Tul. & Wedd. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Castelnavia pendulosa | (C.T.Philbrick & C.P.Bove) C.T.Philbrick & C.P.Bove | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Castelnavia princeps | Tul. & Wedd. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Castelnavia pusillina | Tul. & Wedd. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Castelnavia serpens | Tul. & Wedd. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.