Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Campylanthus glaber | Benth. | 28 | documented |
| Campylanthus salsoloides | (L.f.) Roth | 28 | documented |
| Campylanthus spinosus | Balf.f. | 7 | documented |
| Campylanthus anisotrichus | (A.G.Mill.) Hjertson & A.G.Mill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campylanthus antonii | Thulin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campylanthus chascaniflorus | A.G.Mill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campylanthus hajarensis | Hjertson, Henrot & Thulin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campylanthus hubaishanii | N.Kilian & P.Hein | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campylanthus incanus | A.G.Mill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campylanthus junceus | Edgew. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campylanthus mirandae | A.G.Mill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campylanthus parviflorus | Hjertson & A.G.Mill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campylanthus pungens | Schwartz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campylanthus ramosissimus | Wight | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campylanthus reconditus | Hjertson & Thulin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campylanthus sedoides | A.G.Mill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campylanthus somaliensis | A.G.Mill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campylanthus yemenensis | A.G.Mill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.