Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Campuloclinium macrocephalum | DC. | 241 | documented |
| Campuloclinium alternifolium | Gardner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campuloclinium burchellii | (Baker) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campuloclinium cabralensis | H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campuloclinium campuloclinioides | (Baker) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campuloclinium chlorolepis | (Baker) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campuloclinium hickenii | (Cabrera & Vittet) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campuloclinium hirsutum | Gardner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campuloclinium irwinii | R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campuloclinium megacephalum | (Baker) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campuloclinium parvulum | (B.L.Rob.) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campuloclinium purpurascens | (Baker) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campuloclinium riedelii | (Baker) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campuloclinium scabrum | (Klatt) J.Calvo & Roque | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Campuloclinium tubaraoense | (Hieron.) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.