Campsiandra

Accepted species 22 Documented here 0 Family Fabaceae

Accepted species 22 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Campsiandra comosa Benth. 1 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra angustifolia Spruce ex Benth. 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra aymardii Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra casiquiarensis Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra chigo-montero Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra cowaniana Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra curaara Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra emonensis Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra felipeana Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra ferruginea Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra gomez-alvareziana Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra guayanensis Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra implexicaulis Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra laurifolia Benth. 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra macrocarpa R.S.Cowan 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra nutans Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra pasibensis Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra robclarkiana Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra steyermarkiana Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra taphornii Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra velutina Stergios 0 below the evidence gate
Campsiandra wurdackiana Stergios 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.