Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calyptrogyne ghiesbreghtiana | (Linden & H.Wendl.) H.Wendl. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne allenii | (L.H.Bailey) de Nevers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne anomala | de Nevers & A.J.Hend. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne baudensis | A.J.Hend. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne brachystachys | H.Wendl. ex Burret | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne coloradensis | A.J.Hend. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne condensata | (L.H.Bailey) Wess.Boer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne costatifrons | (L.H.Bailey) de Nevers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne deneversii | A.J.Hend. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne fortunensis | A.J.Hend. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne herrerae | Grayum | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne kunorum | de Nevers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne osensis | A.J.Hend. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne panamensis | A.J.Hend. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne pubescens | de Nevers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne sanblasensis | A.J.Hend. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne trichostachys | Burret | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calyptrogyne tutensis | A.J.Hend. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.