Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calydorea xiphioides | (Poepp.) Espinosa | 12 | documented |
| Calydorea charruana | Deble | 10 | documented |
| Calydorea amabilis | (Ravenna) Goldblatt & Henrich | 3 | documented |
| Calydorea approximata | R.C.Foster | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea undulata | Ravenna | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea campestris | (Klatt) Baker | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea crocoides | Ravenna | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea alba | Roitman & A.Castillo | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea azurea | Klatt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea basaltica | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea bifida | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea cipuroides | Klatt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea gardneri | Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea longipes | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea luteola | (Klatt) Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea minima | Roitman & J.A.Castillo | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea minuana | Deble & F.S.Alves | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea nuda | (Herb.) Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea pallens | Griseb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea riograndensis | Deble | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calydorea venezolensis | (Ravenna) Goldblatt & Henrich | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.