Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calotis lappulacea | Benth. | 83 | documented |
| Calotis cuneifolia | R.Br. | 56 | documented |
| Calotis dentex | R.Br. | 43 | documented |
| Calotis erinacea | Steetz | 13 | documented |
| Calotis scapigera | Hook. | 12 | documented |
| Calotis hispidula | F.Muell. | 11 | documented |
| Calotis glandulosa | F.Muell. | 9 | documented |
| Calotis scabiosifolia | Sond. & F.Muell. | 7 | documented |
| Calotis cuneata | (F.Muell. ex Benth.) G.L.Davis | 6 | documented |
| Calotis cymbacantha | F.Muell. | 5 | documented |
| Calotis plumulifera | F.Muell. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Calotis anamitica | Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calotis ancyrocarpa | J.M.Black | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calotis breviradiata | (Ising) G.L.Davis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calotis breviseta | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calotis caespitosa | C.C.Chang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calotis glabrescens | C.T.White | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calotis inermis | Maiden | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calotis kempei | F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calotis latiuscula | F.Muell. & Tate | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calotis moorei | P.S.Short | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calotis porphyroglossa | F.Muell. ex Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calotis pubescens | (F.Muell. ex Benth.) N.G.Walsh & K.L.McDougall | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calotis squamigera | C.T.White | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calotis suffruticosa | Domin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calotis xanthosioidea | Domin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.