Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calobota cytisoides | (P.J.Bergius) Eckl. & Zeyh. | 34 | documented |
| Calobota sericea | (Thunb.) Boatwr. & B.-E.van Wyk | 31 | documented |
| Calobota angustifolia | (E.Mey.) Boatwr. & B.-E.van Wyk | 24 | documented |
| Calobota halenbergensis | (Merxm. & A.Schreib.) Boatwr. & B.-E.van Wyk | 16 | documented |
| Calobota pungens | (Thunb.) Boatwr. & B.-E.van Wyk | 16 | documented |
| Calobota linearifolia | (E.Mey.) Boatwr. & B.-E.van Wyk | 12 | documented |
| Calobota spinescens | (Harv.) Boatwr. & B.-E.van Wyk | 4 | documented |
| Calobota acanthoclada | (Dinter) Boatwr. & B.-E.van Wyk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calobota cinerea | (E.Mey.) Boatwr. & B.-E.van Wyk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calobota cuspidosa | (Burch.) Boatwr. & B.-E.van Wyk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calobota elongata | (Thunb.) Boatwr. & B.-E.van Wyk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calobota lotononoides | (Schltr.) Boatwr. & B.-E.van Wyk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calobota namibensis | Boatwr. & B.-E.van Wyk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calobota obovata | (Schinz) Boatwr. & B.-E.van Wyk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calobota psiloloba | (E.Mey.) Boatwr. & B.-E.van Wyk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Calobota saharae | (Coss. & Durieu) Boatwr. & B.-E.van Wyk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.